Evaluate your SIEM
Get the guideComplete visibility for DevSecOps
Reduce downtime and move from reactive to proactive monitoring.
A Service Level Agreement (SLA) is a legal obligation or set of obligations made between a service provider and a client or customer, which guarantees certain quality assurances for availability, responsibility and other key metrics. If these measures are not met within the bounds of the agreement, there are consequences against the service provider in the form of a financial penalty, such as a refund, discount, or credit.
Both clients and service providers want ways to create a shared understanding of what the client-to-service-provider agreement is concerning reliability, quality assurance, and minimal guarantees.
Customers want dynamic and reliable products and applications that offer features they can rely on, which also deliver an exceptional digital customer experience. Development teams and businesses want to meet those needs while maintaining their objectives and growth goals.
This is where the contract of an SLA shows its value, utility, and practical purpose.
Different types of SLAs define various levels of agreements, including customer-based SLAs, service-based SLAs, and corporate-level SLAs. SLAs are often defined by various Service Level Objectives (SLOs) which are a smaller subsection within the SLA umbrella. SLOs are the internal objectives that help ensure SLAs are being met, and they are the various metrics that companies will utilize to ensure they’re maintaining quality and reliability on their end of the SLA bargain.
While it’s up to the service provider to maintain the agreement within the SLA, the various aspects of an SLA can range anywhere from customer-service level objectives, like response times, to product-level quality assurance.
Below we break down some key components of an SLA. It’s important to note that not all companies or businesses will utilize each of these aspects. Depending on the type of company, e.g., product-based, tech-based, service-based, certain aspects of quality assurance and reliability wouldn’t be included within the bounds of an SLA.
Businesses don’t always use SLAs today, but when they do, they use them as a kind of road map that needs to be maintained through SLOs and SLIs, which we will discuss below.
SLAs, SLOs, and SLIs all work together to uphold the contract and agreement between a service provider and a client. Below we’ll look at each term and see how it functions in the client–service provider relationship.
SLA: As we mentioned above, a service level agreement is an obligation or set of obligations made between a service provider and a client, which guarantees certain quality assurances for availability, responsibility, and other key metrics. Different types of SLAs define various levels of agreements, including customer-based SLAs, service-based SLAs, and corporate-level SLAs. SLOs, the next subsection of the SLA umbrella, often define SLAs.
SLO:A service level objective is an important aspect of how we measure and maintain the obligations defined in an SLA. SLOs are essentially the percentage benchmark we place on specific metrics that demonstrate how effectively the agreements within an SLA are being upheld. SLOs are expressed through specific, concrete numerical percentiles that represent and measure the efficacy of a specific level of service. Those numbers are representative of the next sub-category, SLIs.
SLI: A service level indicator is a specific metric that helps companies measure some aspect of the level of services to their customers. SLIs can help companies identify ongoing network issues and lead to more efficient recoveries. SLIs are typically measured as percentages, with 0% being terrible performance to 100% being perfect performance. SLIs are the foundation of SLOs, which aim to represent the objectives that an organization is aiming to uphold within its SLA. SLOs will determine which SLIs are underscored and which SLIs will be used to demonstrate quality assurance.
A lot of SLA metrics are defined through SLOs and Service Level Indicators (SLIs), and below we’ll look at some of the most common metrics used to assess quality and reliability within an SLA.
These SLIs help define objectives, which in turn make sure that the SLA is being upheld. If your SLOs aren’t showing strong indicator metrics, then you are at risk of breaching your end of the SLA contract.
SLAs are often broadly used across many different contexts, which makes their application difficult to standardize. However, if organizations are committed to creating a set of SLA best practices, they can narrow their focus and create a transparent, clear, and practical set of metrics to run their services through.
Below are some best practices to help you optimize your SLA strategy.
Create different SLAs for different services you provide.
This will allow you to simplify your SLO and SLA strategy and review your metrics in a much more manageable manner. Additionally, it may not make sense to have one SLA for products and services that have different regulatory conditions or reliability measures.
Companies should know and review their terms at all times.
Yes, legal agreements aren’t fun, but it’s incumbent on your DevOps team and leaders to understand and uphold their end of the agreement.
Understand your customers’ needs and align your SLA to those needs.
SLAs help you have some control over the potential liabilities associated with your products and services, but they also function to provide a level of quality assurance to your customers. It would be somewhat of a waste to guarantee reliability and quality toward a set of conditions that won’t improve the customer or user experience.
Businesses are focused on achieving their goals and maintaining their SLAs, which is why they value robust observability platforms, like Sumo Logic, to help them measure their objectives and ensure they’re on track to meeting their KPIs, deadlines, and long-term strategies.
Try Sumo Logic’s free trial today to see how we can help you reach your goals and maintain quality assurance today.
An SLA violation can result in service credits, penalties or financial reimbursements to the affected party. To remedy an SLA violation, the service provider may need to offer additional services, extend the agreement term, or compensate the customer.
Key components of an effective SLA:
Clearly define the services being provided and the responsibilities of both parties.
Outline specific metrics or key performance indicators (KPI), such as response time, uptime, and resolution time.
Set clear, measurable objectives for each metric to ensure accountability.
Detail how performance will be measured, reported, and reviewed.
Include steps for escalating issues that are not resolved within agreed-upon timeframes.
Clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the service provider and the customer.
Ensure the SLA complies with relevant laws and regulations and establishes a governance structure.
Address how changes to the SLA will be handled and communicated.
Include conditions under which either party can terminate the agreement.
Specify any service credits or penalties for not meeting the agreed-upon service levels.
One notable trend is the adoption of generative AI to automate SLA management processes, improving accuracy and reducing manual effort. Additionally, integrating performance metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) in SLAs is gaining prominence, enabling better measurement of service quality and adherence to customer expectations.
Cloud service has also revolutionized SLAs by offering increased service availability and scalability. Moreover, the focus on customer experience and clear expectations influences the design of more effective SLAs that align with customer needs. Overall, technological advancements and a shift towards customer-centric practices are shaping the future of service-level agreements.
Reduce downtime and move from reactive to proactive monitoring.